Prediction of Liam Broady vs Chung Hyo Woo Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Broady vs C. Hyo Woo

Liam Broady
GBR
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
32
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
308
C. Rank
Ret.
93
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.0M
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Chung Hyo Woo
KOR
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
32
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
308
C. Rank
Ret.
93
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.0M
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Broady 1 - 0 Woo
They have played 2 sets in total, with Liam Broady winning 2 and Chung Hyo Woo winning 0. The last match between Liam Broady and Chung Hyo Woo was at the Seoul Challenger, 07-05-2016, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Liam Broady getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Broady | 1 |
| Woo | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Seoul Challenger(05-07-16)
Liam Broady
6
6
Chung Hyo Woo
0
3
L. Broady vs C. H. Woo H2H Profile
L. Broady vs C. H. Woo Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Liam Broady has won 43.17% of points on their second serve, while Chung Hyo Woo has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Liam Broady, in recent form, has won 40.11% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chung Hyo Woo has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.62% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Liam Broady has saved 49.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chung Hyo Woo has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Liam Broady has won 74.42% of matches played (W/L 64/22), with Chung Hyo Woo winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Liam Broady has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 282/164), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 33/58). Chung Hyo Woo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Liam Broady has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.68% of matches (W/L 56/18), where as Chung Hyo Woo has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Liam Broady winning 1 times and Chung Hyo Woo being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Liam Broady winning 2 and Chung Hyo Woo winning 0.
- The last match between Liam Broady and Chung Hyo Woo was at the Seoul Challenger, 07-05-2016, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Liam Broady getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:51:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Liam Broady has played against opponents with an average rank of 393.35 while Chung Hyo Woo has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Liam Broady has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chung Hyo Woo has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Liam Broady has converted 27.96% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chung Hyo Woo has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Liam Broady vs Chung Hyo Woo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Broady vs C. H. Woo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 0:51:30 | Average Match Time | 0:51:30 |
| 67% (32/48) | 1st Serve % | 64% (30/47) |
| 72% (23/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 63% (10/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 57% (27/47) | Return Points Win % | 31% (15/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Broady 56%, Woo 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Broady 55%, Woo 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Broady 62%, Woo 0%.
L. Broady Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | ||
QF | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-0 6-0 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
F | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
C. H. Woo Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-7(5) 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||

L. Broady vs C. H. Woo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.78% (539/378) | YTD Win/Loss | 30.95% (13/29) |
| 57.21% (1210/905) | Sets Win/Loss | 31.52% (29/63) |
| 53.05% (10555/9342) | Games Win/Loss | 39.87% (307/463) |
| 63.23% (282/164) | Hard Win/Loss | 30.77% (12/27) |
| 54.93% (78/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 61.34% (146/92) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 36.26% (33/58) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 2497 | Aces Total | 15 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1593 | Total Double Faults | 52 |
| 1:14:30 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 515.55 | Average Opponent Rank | 364.17 |
| 63% (30622/48681) | 1st Serve % | 65% (526/809) |
| 68% (20924/30622) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (275/526) |
| 52% (9446/18052) | 2nd Serve Win % | 34% (96/283) |
| 43% (2068/4798) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (25/72) |
| 40% (19260/48313) | Return Points Win % | 35% (263/745) |
| 47.27% (26/29) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.98% (40/47) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 56.01% (233/183) | Challenger W/L | 6.25% (1/15) |
| 67.55% (229/110) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (12/12) |
| 59% (527/888) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 31% (13/42) |
| 35% (6/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (140/276) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 53% (142/270) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 88% (528/462) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (11/10) |
| 12% (528/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (11/1) |
| 20% (386/76) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (31/3) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 30 Nov, 05:00 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 05:30 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 04:00 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 02:05 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 03:00 PM
PredictionSun, 30 Nov, 06:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

29 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

29 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets

28 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Betting Tips & Picks November 28, 2025
Top Predictions Today
12:00
H2H 1-0
14:05
H2H 0-0
15:00
H2H 0-0
18:00
H2H 0-0
22:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Athens Challenger
Greece
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Temuco Challenger
Chile
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Gwalior
India
M15 La Paz
Bolivia
M15 Lima
Peru
M15 Madrid
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M15 Ribeirao Preto
Brazil
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Luanda
Angola